Learning Objectives This is a beginning to intermediate level course. After completing this course, mental health professionals will be able to:
I no longer endorse all the statements in this document. I think many of the conclusions are still correct, but especially section 1 is weaker than it should be, and many reactionaries complain I am pigeonholing all of them as agreeing with Michael Anissimov, which they do not; this complaint seems reasonable.
This document needs extensive revision to stay fair and correct, but such revision is currently lower priority than other major projects.
Until then, I apologize for any inaccuracies or misrepresentations. What is this FAQ? It is meant to rebut some common beliefs held by the political movement called Reaction or Neoreaction.
What are the common beliefs of the political movement called Reaction or Neoreaction? Neoreaction is a political ideology supporting a return to traditional ideas of government and society, especially traditional monarchy and an ethno-nationalist state. It sees itself opposed to modern ideas like democracy, human rights, multiculturalism, and secularism.
Will this FAQ be a rebuttal the arguments in that summary? Some but not all. I worry I may have done too good a job of steelmanning Reactionary positions in that post, emphasizing what I thought were strong arguments, sometimes even correct arguments, but not really the arguments Reactionaries believed or considered most important.
Some of them seem really dumb to me and I excluded them from the previous piece, but they make it in here. Other points from the previous post are real Reactionary beliefs and make it in here as well. Do all Reactionaries believe the same things? Even more confusingly, sometimes the same people seem to switch among the three without giving any indication they are aware that they are doing so.
In particular the difference between feudal monarchies and divine-right-of-kings monarchies seems to be sort of lost on many of them. Mencius is probably the most famous Reactionary, one of the founders of the movement, and an exceptionally far-thinking and knowledgeable writer.
Michael is also quite smart, very prolific, and best of all for my purposes unusually willing to state Reactionary theories plainly and explicitly in so many words and detail the evidence that he thinks supports them.
Mencius usually supports a state-as-corporation model and Michael seems to be more to the feudal monarchy side, with both occasionally paying lip service to divine-right-of-kings absolutism as well.
Are you going to treat Reaction and Progressivism as real things? One of the problems in exercises like this is how much to take political labels seriously. Both combine many very diverse ideas, and sometimes exactly who falls on what side will be exactly the point at issue.
Although debating the meaning of category words is almost never productive, I feel like in that case I have more than enough excuse. Is everything getting worse? It is a staple of Reactionary thought that everything is getting gradually worse.Research Paper By Astrid Richardson (Youth and Parenting Coaching, UNITED STATES) This research paper will explore the four parenting styles based on studies conducted by Baumrind () Continue.
Review of Psychopathy. William D.
Tillier; Calgary Alberta; Update: Under construction. and before. Table of contents. 1).
Synopsis of Psychopathy. A parenting style is a pattern of behavior that influences child-rearing practices.
Parenting style can be very simply defined as how a person parents. Parents are sometimes troubled by the fear that their style of parenting may . Aas, H., Klepp, K., Laberg, J.
C., & Aaro, L. E. (). Predicting adolescents' intentions to drink alcohol: Outcome expectancies and self-efficacy. Special Collection Stepping Stones to Caring for Our Children, 3rd Edition (SS3).
Stepping Stones, Third Edition (SS3) is the collection of selected CFOC3 standards which, when put into practice, are most likely to prevent serious adverse outcomes in child care and early education settings.
Adverse outcomes are defined as harm resulting from failure to practice the recommendations in the CFOC3. Multiple sources were used to collect secondary research including web search, scholarly journals, and published book chapters.
The focus of the research is to gather existing information pertaining to how adolescent boys living in single parent homes display behavior that may be seen as violent or abusive.